Neo-Nazis "hijack" the Confederate rag in Houston, "Heritage" community complicit...

(Image courtesy of Facebook)





The Nazi scum rallied with Confederate rags in front of the NAACP in Houston, Texas, this past weekend. The Heritage community has been vacillating between complete silence and whole-hearted support of Hitler's spawn using the rag to promote their Nazi beliefs. One Heritage all-star, Auntie Ruckus pulled out all the stops in her defense of the Nazis.





(Image courtesy of Facebook)




Did you catch that folks? Nazis = Nice people cuz grandaddy wuz white! That's how it works. No, really. Dead serious. Folks, lest we forget that Barnum is one of the biggest names in Confederate Heritage. Just to be sure that we are on the same page, here's one of the rally participants. Check out his sweet ink!





(Image courtesy of Facebook)




Folks, the Heritage community is absolutely complicit, if not outright supportive of Nazis using "their sacred flag" for their own hateful purposes. There is no outrage. There is no denouncement. You haven't and won't see any statements from the Sons of Confederate Veterans. It is because they are racists too folks. Trust me on this. 





The "14 Words" are a white supremacist slogan coined by white power terrorist David Eden Lane. (Image courtesy of Fox26)






Restoring the honor!






Comments

  1. Debbie Sidle isn't buying it...

    https://www.facebook.com/aletha.brown.92/posts/1640833782899178

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wonder if Arlene's aware of the One Drop Rule. It wouldn't matter if her father was white, these people are never going to truly accept her. They don't view their heritage as her heritage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I doubt she cares whether they like her or not. The whites kiss her ass because she gives them cover for their racism.

      Delete
    2. So you are omniscient now? You know what matters to people without having been told? You think you are GOD now, sledridge? That's enough to get you institutionalized... worse thank thinking you are Napoleon.

      Delete
    3. It's being proven out. See Cooper, Karen.

      I guess I have the same omniscience you have in knowing BLM is a "hate group".

      Delete
    4. Ah, no. Only those who burn towns and loot their own neighborhoods....

      Delete
    5. One drop rule? You really are a throwback, aren't you, sledridge? Going waaaaayyy back to find basically irrelevant stuff to throw at people you don't like.....

      Delete
    6. I'm the throwback. You're the one trying to keep those by-gone days alive. I'm just pointing out the ludicrousy of those times.

      It's been pointed out time and again, that blacks within the "heritage" groups will never actually be accepted. They'll always be like the former slaves at the reunions. Tokens and mascots. Not like colleagues or equals.

      Delete
  3. "There is no outrage. There is no denouncement. You haven't and won't see any statements from the Sons of Confederate Veterans."

    The National Socialist Movement uses the US flag and I don't see any denouncements.

    Don't you want to confront them and take that flag?

    Oh, yeah...you remember the "Battle of Sacramento" where 200-300 SJWs (an assortment of lesbians, college boys and geeks) attacked 20 skinheads. And even though they inflicted a few casualties at the beginning, they eventually ran off like scared rabbits.

    You pick your battles.
    No sense in confronting skinheads.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "The National Socialist Movement uses the US flag and I don't see any denouncements." - I denounce! Denounce! Stop using the US flag, Nazis! What about the Southern Cross? Nah. You can keep it. It's more representative of you. Gets your message across real nice.

      Of course, that isn't their official flag. It's a nationalistic symbol. They believe the US is theirs.

      Delete
    2. "No sense in confronting skinheads."

      I'd say no courage. No guts. No concern about Confederate heritage.

      But then perhaps the real reason is that you agree with them more than you want to admit.

      Sure explains the fake screen name.

      Delete
    3. Jacob has already said he doesn't care about the US flag being walked on. He says it's just a piece of cloth. He is willing to hold people to standards he doesn't hold himself to. Corey has said he doesn't care if the US flag is abused. He is willing to hold people to standards he doesn't hold himself to.These people are flaming hypocrits, Border Ruffian. They don't care about flags, race, or any noble thing like that. Leftism taught them they should hate whites and whiteness, but they MUST hate Southern whites and whiteness, and so they do.

      Delete
    4. Ooooo... Leftism! Hate whites and whiteness! We don't care about flags or race... wait, what?

      I thought we hated whites and "whiteness". Anything to your left is "leftism". That's 99% of the population, but they're still your enemy. Wait, I'm left-handed. I'm not marked for execution, am I?

      Delete
    5. "No sense in confronting skinheads."

      Or Tripp Lewis. At least that what Chastain and BR have decided to do. Apparently it doesn't bother them when a white man calls a black woman an idiot for deploring the death of inncocent people.

      Delete
    6. Simpson, "I'd say no courage. No guts." You'd know about that, wouldn't you? From experience.

      "No concern about Confederate heritage. But then perhaps the real reason is that you agree with them more than you want to admit. Sure explains the fake screen name."

      Well, you'd say that because you're a liar and a false accuser. It's obvious what the real reason is but you can't drum up hate for BR with it, so you toss it away in favor of falsity. Speaking of fake screen names, what do you imagine explains Jacob's fake screen name?

      Delete
    7. Your hypocrisy and double standards amuse me.

      Delete
    8. Confront Tripp? It's between him and Karen, and I think they're both capable of handling it. See, your notion that somebody should "confront" something that doesn't involve them is ULTRA-LEFTISM -- i.e., total busy-bodiness, and one of the hallmark characteristics of the yankee mentality since before the country was founded. But not busy-bodiness like that of the old lady neighbor down the street. Leftist busy-bodiness involves more than just gossip. It means using words to push, prod and exacerbate the situation to the point that somebody gets hurt. (Simpson has a long track record for wanting to see harm come to the Flaggers, individually or collectively.)

      The LAST thing Simpson wants is for Karen and Tripp to work this out between themselves. Simpson wants festering sores, and he'd like exterior "confrontation" to pick at it until that happens. Ugly mentality, he has.

      As for calling Karen an idiot, did you even read the exchange, Simpson? He didn't call her anything "for deploring the death of innocent people." When you get down to it, she didn't deplore the death of innocent people. Geez, and you an academic. She is accusing Trump in advance of something he hasn't done (killing innocent Muslims). Tripp points out that Hillary has already shed innocent Muslim blood by financing ISIS.

      Karen then attempts to even up this glaring discrepancy in her position (attack Trump for something he has not done, ignore that Hillary has already done it) with the lame explanation that she's not voting for Hillary, either, as if that should smooth it over. She isn't deploring the deaths of innocent people Hillary has already enabled, or deploring Hillary for enabling them. She just ain't gonna vote for her, and that should make it even. That is what Tripp calls her an idiot for, as if not voting for Hillary excuses her for enabling those deaths.

      The namecalling (which Simpson has done far, far more than Tripp) in poor taste, sure, and it's not true, because Karen is not an idiot ... but her comments and reasoning are, indeed, idiotic. She has done similar things a number of times on FB to justify her position on Trump, which really doesn't need justification. People can be for and against whoever they wish.

      But it seems to not be enough for Karen to express her opinion about it ... she actively pursues comment and conflict with Trump supporters (while hiding behind her, "I'm not voting for Hillary, either," non-excuse).

      Simpson, of course, probably doesn't know all this background, and wouldn't care if he did. All he and you care about, Jacob, is misportraying the tiny part of the iceberg above the surface, without acknowledging you know absolutely nothing about the vast bulk below the surface, so you misconstrue it, as well, to fit your hate agenda. Leftism at it's finest.

      Delete
  4. 1) What are you talking about? This entire blog is a denouncement.

    2) I do not run any groups specifically organized for the purposes of "defending my "heritage"". I do not style myself as a defender of Americanism, but those that are being criticized specifically claim that their "heritage" is being hijacked, yet we see zero action on their part, even something as simple as a statement. Nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They're not being hijacked. That's your interpretation, made for the purpose of justifying your fomenting of hatred for them.

      Delete
    2. "They're not being hijacked."

      You got that right! Your "Heritage" has been given away. Y'all are too skeered to defend it.

      Delete
    3. Actually, Chastain tries to defend it. She just isn't very good at it ... kinda like her career as a writer. Susan Hathaway, on the other hand, is downright skeered. Just ask the folks at the VMFA.

      Delete
    4. Simpson's long-standing crusade to have the VMFA deprive Susan of her livelihood now surfaces on Jacob's hate blog.

      As for my writing not being very good... how would you know? Your reviews of my books on Amazon are fraudulent because you admitted you have not read them. Most of the reviews are very favorable. Those that are not are politically motivated.

      Delete
    5. "Simpson's long-standing crusade to have the VMFA deprive Susan of her livelihood now surfaces on Jacob's hate blog."

      I don't follow, what do you mean by this?

      Delete
    6. Rb, we aren't supposed to talk about such things. Just because Susan is the very visible, somewhat vocal at the right constructed moment-head of the group that suffers racists, it's Dr. Simpson's fault that Susan is known as a neo-Confederate.

      Delete
  5. "You pick your battles. No sense in confronting skinheads."

    Bullcrap. Y'all agree with racist skinheads. That is why y'all don't confront them. From Neo-Nazis, to racist skins, to Klansmen, to LOSers, down to "Heritage", the fight and cause is all the same. Y'all hate blacks and other minorities and you mad cuz white supremacy is going bye-bye.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, Jacob. Let me explain something that you, as an American, should know -- but that you, as an extreme left-wingnut, flatout reject. Either freedom of speech is for everyone, or it is for nobody.

      Aren't you always talking about how it is your right to write this blog and foment hatred for Flaggers and various and sundry other heritage folks? Well, skinheads and others of their ilk have the same right. You would deny them that? You would have people who disagree with them "confront" them and shut them up? Yes? No? Why confront?

      YOu have absolutely no evidence that hate for blacks and minorities is a component of heritage support...there's far more hate for heritage folks on your blog than there is for blacks in the heritage community... why is that, Jacob? And your hate is the fomenting kind -- the kind that encourages confrontation (in which violence and hurt or dead people are always possible). Why is that, Jacob?

      Delete
    2. Folks, take note that Chastain is sympathizing with Nazis. Here folks, go look at the webpage of these nice people who are just exercising their First Amendment rights to tell the world what a great guy Adolf Hitler was, and how wonderful it was that he tried to erase an entire race of people from existence:

      http://www.voiceofthears.com

      Folks, never forget that Connie has these sick Nazis back.

      Delete
    3. How is defending the right to free speech sympathizing with Nazis? The only reason you don't tell the world what a great guy Stalin or Mao were (their death toll greatly exceeds Hitler's) is because the only person you really admire is yourself... but you believe what they enforced. Hitler murdered by race, commies murdered indiscriminately from sheer blood lust. I guess you consider that superior murder....

      Delete
    4. Jacob, if I have their back, how come I know next to nothing about them? And how come you are intimately familiar with them? How come you've made it your avocation (and maybe your vocation, for all I know) to immerse yourself in their world? Does pretending to be against them give you an excuse to wallow pleasurably in their philosophy? That's what this whole blog is, you know... pleasurably wallowing in the mud and slop you claim to disapprove of....

      Delete
  6. Skinheads ares scum and nobody takes them seriously, Jacob, except you, and only as a tarbrush for smearing others (not skinheads) that you don't like.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can you show us a single Heritage advocate who spoke out against these Nazis co-opting the sacred rag? We're told over and over again that they are doing this against y'all's wishes, but I can't ever recall a single instance where a Heritage advocate did anything about it. Not a single protest, denouncement, nothing. These guys are straight up Nazis (I've done my homework). By the way, Jason Bertera, seen front and center with the rag above? He was in DC last summer when the whole lot of Heritage losers ran screaming and fearing for their lives.

      http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xIHDeXKlq64/VeyCh28QYjI/AAAAAAAAEiA/RORsiG3P8zk/s1600/IMG_7110.jpg

      Not exactly the kind of resistance their Confederate ancestors would have expected, but then again, y'all don't have an ounce of intestinal fortitude (y'all showed that a few weeks ago when Leftists made a mockery of your Heritage in Richmond). That's y'all's buddy Dirty D. Stuffing his white nationalist propaganda in Bertera's backpack. Bertera has been a busy boy. He's flying all over the country attending Nazi and Heritage rallies. I wonder whose dime he's flying on? Prolly the Feds. Hey, look who else was in DC with Dirty D., Bertera, and the alleged pedo king:

      http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-awAQCupvqbo/VeyBLaba5AI/AAAAAAAAEhQ/KlSPKgL9lL8/s1600/IMG_7098.jpg

      Delete
    2. LOL!

      http://restoringthehonor.blogspot.com/2016/08/hate-not-heritage-ah-yes-ol-14-words.html

      Delete
  7. "YOu have absolutely no evidence that hate for blacks and minorities is a component of heritage support"

    https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-yns0T_fI5SA/V62gASJ2KwI/AAAAAAAALLw/dEoM7Lllvy04SG7NI_VjSm2q-BTzqIskgCLcB/s1600/Childish%2B1.tiff

    It was nice of Randall to combine his "Heritage" with his racial hatred for "niggers". No evidence, LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Randall is one person. He isn't heritage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, yeah, sure. Y'all are totally in disagreement with his sentiment. We've read all about it everywhere. LOL!

      Delete
    2. You are soooooo illogical. Does it come naturally? Or did you have to cultivate it?

      Delete
    3. But you're a liar and a hater, Jacob, so this statement is meaningless.

      Delete
  9. "Can you show us a single Heritage advocate who spoke out against these Nazis co-opting the sacred rag? We're told over and over again that they are doing this against y'all's wishes, but I can't ever recall a single instance where a Heritage advocate did anything about it. Not a single protest, denouncement, nothing."

    You're not omniscient, Jacob, it has happened, but even if you knew it happened, you wouldn't acknowledge it. What you mean is you noodled around on Facebook and couldn't find anything about it happening, so you are announcing in your "omniscience" that it has never happened. You get more transparent every day....

    There's also another factor. We respect the Constitutional right to free speech, even offensive speech, you don't. You would institute speech codes and throw people in gulags for what they say that you don't like, if you had the power. That's what leftism is -- controlling everything other people do, say, think. It's what leftists live for. Besides, our activism IS a type of pushback. (Maybe you should take a sabbatical from your hate-blog and read up on the founding of this country, particularly the rights and liberties of the people. Yes, the restrictions are on government but the constitute guidelines for all Americans to follow.)

    "These guys are straight up Nazis (I've done my homework)."

    That is supposed to impress me? I don't know you. I don't know what "homework" means to you (probably noodling around on Facebook). I don't how thorough you are at it, or how accurate the interpretations you put on what you find. Try again.

    "By the way, Jason Bertera, seen front and center with the rag above? He was in DC last summer when the whole lot of Heritage losers ran screaming and fearing for their lives."

    Disappointed heritage folks got away with their lives? Sorry nobody got sent to the hospital?

    "Not exactly the kind of resistance their Confederate ancestors would have expected, but then again, y'all don't have an ounce of intestinal fortitude (y'all showed that a few weeks ago when Leftists made a mockery of your Heritage in Richmond)."

    The Richmond event was an SEIU protest for a $15 minimum wage... Conflating on whim is one of your greatest gifts, isn't it? The D.C. event was a peaceful protest (except for the violence-threateners you so admire), not a military skirmish such as our Confederate forebears excelled at. You'd prefer heritage bloodshed, I get it, I get it. Sorry you were disappointed and still nursing your disappointment....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. " it has happened, but even if you knew it happened, you wouldn't acknowledge it."

      On the contrary, I'm dying just to read one instance of it, but you can produce ZERO, and that's because it hasn't happened. Y'all give cover to nazis and pretend that you have no idea about anything. It's like WWII never even happened to y'all. White power folks are organizing under the cover of Confederate heritage and the Heritage crowd is absolutely complicit. You have "nigger" hating Flaggers at Heritage events. You're all liars.

      Delete
    2. I don't cover for Nazis. I'm not a liar... you do much more of that than heritage folks do... first by not differentiating who is heritage and who is just pretending to be. Moreover, I don't go digging up the Internet looking for Nazis, or manufacturing them if I don't find any. I wonder what that does for you....

      Delete
    3. Sure the Heritage community gives cover to Nazis. Show me one single action y'all are taking to stop them from co-opting your Heritage for their own hateful purposes? You can't. It's because y'all aren't doing anything, because you don't really care.

      Delete
    4. They're not co-opting heritage. They bastardize it and then embrace that. The bastardization is not real. It's a phony construct. What we are doing is honoring our heritage -- real heritage -- the way we see fit.

      Delete
    5. Are they bastardizing it? Sounds like they are more closely adherent to your secessionist heroes. They are open and honest about their feelings towards minorities just as your secessionist heroes. They clearly are trying to establish a white supremacist society(if not white only), just like you and your secessionist heroes. The only difference I can see is their honesty and you're still in the closet. Maybe you don't like wearing hoods? Or maybe the soot smell from a burning cross is hard to get out of clothes.

      Whatever it is, quit fighting it, Connie. Embrace it. You'll find honesty is the best policy.

      Delete
    6. sledridge, the stench of your lying is coming through my computer.

      Delete
    7. >sniff< I showered just this morning. So, it is you, who are lying.

      You claim you want nothing to do with these people. Yet, you cry genocide of your "southern white heritage". Openly say that whites are *the* reason for the good in the world. Exclaim that we need to protect the white children, and say "What's wrong with that? That isn't racist." You say the same things these people say. But, pretend you aren't them.

      I don't want to believe you are. It's hard for me to understand anyone thinking these things. But, then there you are saying these things.

      Delete
    8. --- You claim you want nothing to do with these people. Yet, you cry genocide of your "southern white heritage". ---

      So? I decry the wiping out of my Confederate heritage -- removal of the flags, monuments, names, etc. You equate that with cozying up to "these people"?

      --- Openly say that whites are *the* reason for the good in the world. ---

      Link please. What I've said is that white people have done more that helps the people of the world than other groups. I have also said, when people blame whites for all the evils of the world, that they are refusing to admit the good white people have done.

      --- Exclaim that we need to protect the white children, and say "What's wrong with that? That isn't racist." You say the same things these people say. But, pretend you aren't them. ---

      So? Some of them probably eat cheeseburgers. So do I? Does that make me one of them? You think white children should not be protected because a bunch of ignorant bigots say they should? Do you define ALL your principles by what they say? And do you sincerely believe that because white supes put a bizarre meaning on a phrase, it must always and forever carry that meaning, and its actual, true meaning has been forever removed? That's ludicrous, sledge.

      --- I don't want to believe you are. It's hard for me to understand anyone thinking these things. But, then there you are saying these things.---

      You can't understand the notion that white children should be protected. Are you white, sledge? Do you have kids? Why don't you take them down to a street where junkies and gangs hang out and ask someone with a heroine needle in their arm to babysit?

      Your problem is that you are taking some words, removing their actual, logical meaning and accepting some lurid meaning based on the usage of some marginal psychos... How logical is that?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Shaun Winkler becomes unglued over the Sons of Confederate Veterans "pet monkey"...

Virginia Flagger Hubert Wayne Cash: "I have learned that most but by no means all blacks are a worthless bunch of freeloading, dangerous, animals that should be put down like the dogs they are."

Infight The Right: Are Christopher Cantwell and Jason Kessler backstabbing buddyfuckers?