Hate Not Heritage: Send South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley "back to the reservation" says one apparent Virginia Flaggers supporter...

(Image courtesy of Facebook)




You can't make this up. Would you expect anything less of a Virginia Flaggers supporter? Looks like Jack is a repeat offender.





Restoring the honor!





Comments

  1. Doesn't matter to me where she gets sent ... just get her out of the Governor's office specifically and keep her out of political office in general.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe a nice little tee pee out on the prarie?

      Guess what I'm working on just for you? The history of Sulser and Heritage/Flaggers. Oh my. I must say, it is a lot. So many dates and names. If I arrange it all in a pattern, we can make a picture after we connect all of the dots.

      Delete
    2. No, Connie, native Americans are the ones... Nikki Haley isn't...

      Who am I kidding? Y'all wouldn't care even if you knew.

      Delete
    3. Connie seems to miss the point once again. Haley is not American Indian...but India Indian...and born here in the US.

      Delete
    4. I'm not missing the point, Corey. I don't CARE about it, capisce?

      Yes, sledridge, I know Nikki is Sikh. Did you know that language evolves and changes? That word and terms can, and often do, take on new meanings as time goes by?


      Delete
    5. Look, if they aren't white, Chastain says they can't be right.

      Delete
    6. So Connie, you approve of Jack Lane's comments.

      Delete
    7. Connie, are you suggesting that it's understandable to get Sikh Indians confused with Native Americans? I assumed you knew the difference. I was just joshin' ya. I didn't think you would try to defend it.

      There is no language evolution here. Even if you want to call them Indians, there's still no confusing the two. Completely different cultures. Completely different geographical locations. The only way you might confuse them is if you just viewed everyone that isn't white as non-white and lumped them altogether. Which, I assume, is Jack Lane's approach.

      Delete
    8. Once more, Chastain's simple refusal to admit to a mistake leads to more ridicule.

      Delete
  2. Ah, there goes Chastain again, defending racist rhetoric.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see you've been challenged to a debate...

      https://civilwarchat.wordpress.com/2016/07/02/will-brooks-simpson-debate/

      Delete
    2. Stop posting things here that are more appropriate at other blogs. This is your only warning, future posts that are irrelevant to the discussion will be deleted for no other reason than your inability to stay on topic. Otherwise, I pretty much let everything through even when I don't agree with you.

      Delete
    3. Racist rhetoric? A great deal of what's called "racism" or "racist" isn't.

      Delete
    4. Well that helps you avoid being a racist in your mind at least...but so so sad.

      Delete
    5. "A great deal of what's called "racism" or "racist" isn't." - So, we keep getting told.

      Delete
  3. You'll have to understand that by Chastain's own admission, BR is using your board to carry on his personal vendettas, all the while hiding behind a fake screen name. You'll have to decide whether you want your blog hijacked as a surrogate battlefield.

    Mr. Leigh's debate challenge is sheer nonsense. A real historian would ask what were the motivations behind Republican advocacy of black suffrage during Reconstruction and discuss how they evolved over time and in response to events. But Mr. Leigh's not a real historian ... at least not a very good one. He just wants to draw attention to himself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah. It's getting old. They very rarely offer anything of substance.

      Delete
    2. I would love to see you debate him. First set ground rules. Only facts would be allowed. They must be checked in and vetted by professional historians to be used in the debate.

      I figure the debate challenge would end right there.

      Delete
    3. Simpson, the flippin' owner of this hate blog hides behind a fake screen name. Lots of your commenters at YOUR hate blog hide behind screen names .... so, your point is?

      Professional historians = people indoctrinated into the same truncated, ideologically shaped and agreed-upon narrative about history....

      Delete
    4. I'm not interested in giving a hack that sort of attention. I write what I want to write about. Don't worry. He'll make a fool of himself again. Even the comments section reveal the flaws in his approach.

      Delete
    5. Poor Chastain. All she's got is her flippin' stale rhetoric that she thinks makes her a happenin' cool chick, capisce? But it doesn't conceal her inability to distinguish between non-white people, or her inability to own up to her error ... because, of course, she meant to blast all non-white, non-Protestant people (she will, sooner or later).

      Bigot. Ignorant bigot, but still a bigot.

      Delete
    6. Didn't your parents tell you to not give out your name to strangers? I cant think of anyone stranger than the Virginia Flaggers.

      Delete
  4. Simple challenge for BR: start posting under your real name. Why so skeered? Is that an example of southern honor?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Suggestion, Simpson. How about the creator of this hate blog post under his real name first? THEN you can take up the matter with BR.... J

    ReplyDelete
  6. Boy, Simp. You're really stung by BR bringing up the dishonor at Barrett Honors College, aren't ya? Do you know how transparent you are?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I am sure he will insert his foot into his mouth. He has a habit of doing that.

    Poor KKKonnie, once again rejecting historical thinking because it produces results using facts. She is so afraid to learn. It must be hard to live with such a psychological handicap.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Shaun Winkler becomes unglued over the Sons of Confederate Veterans "pet monkey"...

Virginia Flagger Hubert Wayne Cash: "I have learned that most but by no means all blacks are a worthless bunch of freeloading, dangerous, animals that should be put down like the dogs they are."

Infight The Right: Are Christopher Cantwell and Jason Kessler backstabbing buddyfuckers?